Nataqua versus Mahala

A gathering of Maidu women at Johnstonville, 1900

On April 26, 1856, twenty settlers in the Honey Lake Valley gathered at Isaac Roop’s Trading Post and held a “mass convention” to establish a territory of their own. They named their new republic Nataqua.  It was purported that the name was a Paiute word for woman. That claim is rather dubious. Nataqua Territory was a short lived affair, and it was soon replaced  with the Sierra Nevada Territory.

Locally, the Anglos used term Mahala for designation of Native American women. A number of these women worked as domestics such cleaning and washing. Willow Creek Valley resident Abe Tunison for instance wrote in his diary on May 28, 1877 “A Mahala was here and washed.”

During the late 1800s’ the term squaw was used infrequently and usually derogatory manner, i.e, there are many newspaper citations  of a “drunken squaw.”

Tim

 

One thought on “Nataqua versus Mahala”

  1. According to Archeologist and Lassen Countyite Francis Riddell, “Mahala” was acceptable to the Native Americans, and I know the word was commonly used by Whites in the Lookout-Adin area.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.